This Thesis is written to discuss the truth of Samuel P. Huntington’s thesis about the clash civilization between Islam and West. This Theorized clash civilization. Jauh sebelum Samuel Huntington menuliskan buku TheClash of Civilization. MenurutQuthb, benturanbenturan itu terjadikarena peradaban Barat yang. Download Citation on ResearchGate | BENTURAN PERADABAN DAN CARUT- MARUT POSTMODERNISME Huntington, Samuel P
|Country:||Saint Kitts and Nevis|
|Published (Last):||10 March 2006|
|PDF File Size:||17.22 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.76 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural. Journal of Peace Research. In addition, he cites the fact that many Islamic extremists spent a significant amount of time living or studying in the Western world. Young Islam on Trek: Edward Said issued a response to Huntington’s thesis in his article, ” The Clash of Ignorance “. Russia, Japan, and India are what Huntington terms ‘swing civilizations’ and may favor either side.
Huntington argues that the trends of global conflict after the end of the Cold War are increasingly appearing at these civilizational divisions. Turkeywhose political leadership has systematically tried to Westernize the country since the s, is his chief example.
In Huntington’s view, intercivilizational conflict manifests itself in two forms: Afterward I analyze with the clash of civilization by which introduce by Huntington.
In Huntington’s view, East Asian Sinic civilization is culturally asserting itself and its values relative to the West due to its rapid economic growth. He also gives the example of Australia as a country torn between its Western civilizational heritage and its growing economic engagement with Asia. Views Read Edit View history. International Politics, 39 2pp. On the contrary, Persians civilization will be masterpiece for Eastern world.
These critics [ who? These conflicts may pfradaban from a number of causes, such as: Core state conflicts can arise out of fault line conflicts when core states become involved.
Clash of Civilizations
The initiative is intended peradbaan galvanize collective action across diverse societies to combat extremismto overcome cultural and social barriers between mainly the Western and predominantly Muslim worlds, and to reduce the tensions and polarization between societies which differ in religious and cultural values.
Then, we will regain the Turkish public opinion support in one day. Some theorists and writers argued that human rights sammuel, liberal democracyand the capitalist free market economy had become the only remaining ideological alternative for nations in the post-Cold War world.
This has been successfully demonstrated by documenting the huntingtin of Christianity from the Hellenized Roman Empirethe rise of the Islamic caliphates from the Christianized Roman Empire and the rise of Ottoman rule from the Islamic caliphates and the Christianized Roman Empire.
In his thesis, he argued that the primary axis of conflict in the future will be along cultural lines. Perhaps the ultimate example of non-Western modernization is Russia, the core state of the Orthodox civilization. Concerning this region, Huntington departs from Kitsikis contending that a civilizational fault line exists between the two dominant yet differing religions Eastern Huntungton and Sunni Islamhence a dynamic of external conflict. This research use of historical method involving four steps: In commemoration of Sita Ram Goel.
Japan, China and the Four Benturna Tigers have modernized in many respects while maintaining traditional or authoritarian societies which distinguish them from the West.
The Globalization of World Politics. But after the end of the Cold Warworld politics moved into a new phase, in which non-Western civilizations are no longer the exploited recipients of Western civilization but have become additional important actors joining the Samueel to shape and move world history.
He argues there is no “Islamic civilization” nor a “Western civilization”, and that the evidence for a civilization clash is not convincing, especially when considering relationships such as that between the United States and Saudi Arabia.
Benturqn page was last edited on 12 Decemberat Archived from the original on Specifically, he believes that China’s goals are to reassert itself as the regional hegemonand that other countries in the region will ‘bandwagon’ with China due to the history of hierarchical command structures implicit in the Confucian Sinic civilization, perxdaban opposed to the individualism and pluralism valued in the West.
Noam Chomsky has criticized the concept of the clash of civilizations as just being a new justification for the United States “for any atrocities that they wanted to carry out”, which was required after the Cold War as the Soviet Union was no longer a viable threat. Huntington believes this to be a real consequence of several factors, including the previously mentioned Muslim youth bulge and population growth and Islamic proximity to many civilizations including Sinic, Orthodox, Western, and African.
User Username Password Remember me. In the past, world history was mainly about the struggles between monarchs, nations and ideologies, such as seen within Western civilization. Russia, for example, clashes with the many Muslim ethnic groups on its southern border such as Chechnya but—according to Huntington—cooperates with Iran to avoid further Muslim-Orthodox violence in Southern Russia, and to help continue the flow of oil.
Huntington also believes that some of the factors contributing to this conflict are that both Christianity upon which Western civilization is based and Islam are:. From Oslo to Iraq and the Road Map.
Clash of Civilizations – Wikipedia
Huntington sees Islamic civilization as a potential ally to China, both having more revisionist goals and sharing common conflicts with other civilizations, especially the West.
Its political and economic elite must support bentkran move. Huntington refers to countries that are seeking to affiliate with another civilization as “torn countries”. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. It is to set forth descriptive hypothesis as to what the future may be like.
Specifically, he identifies common Chinese and ;eradaban interests in the areas of weapons proliferation, human rights, and democracy that conflict with those of the West, and feels that these are areas in which the two civilizations will cooperate.